Skip to main content

The Traffic NG

Musa

Two generals from Zangon Kataf. Two careers forged in the Nigerian Army. Two men who rose far beyond Southern Kaduna yet never stopped being claimed by it.

The comparison is not nostalgia. It is a pattern: when a son of the Atyap reaches national rank and then speaks plainly about what his people have suffered, the reaction is rarely quiet.

Major General Zamani Lekwot and General Christopher Gwabin Musa stand in that line. One was dragged through a military tribunal after the 1992 Zangon Kataf crisis. The other, now Minister of Defence, has said on national television that Southern Kaduna cannot be happy with a former governor he accuses of having “deliberately planned for the killing of our people.”

The first paid with prison and a death sentence later commuted and pardoned. The second is being given an ultimatum by the El-Rufai family to retract or produce evidence. The principle is the same: silence is treated as the price of high office. Both men have refused to pay it.

What Lekwot did for his people

Lekwot was born in 1944 in Ashong Ashyui, Zangon Kataf. He became military governor of Rivers State, commandant of the Nigerian Defence Academy, and GOC 82 Division.

After retirement he became a standing voice for Southern Kaduna chairman of the Southern Kaduna Elders Consultative Forum, advocate for a Southern Kaduna state, and holder of the traditional title Agwabyin Atyap.
His defining ordeal was the 1992 Zangon Kataf crisis.

The immediate spark was a market relocation. Violence in February and May killed hundreds on both sides and spread to Kaduna city. A military tribunal sentenced Lekwot and several other Atyap leaders to death. He has always insisted he was framed: a serving or recently retired general, he argued, does not go to his village to organise the killing of villagers.

READ ALSO: Afrobasket Champions: Tinubu Fulfils Financial Reward Promise To D’Tigress

Human-rights lawyers and later accounts of the Oputa Panel process described the trial as lacking due process. He and others were eventually pardoned. He never recanted his account of how the crisis began or how only one side’s leaders were swept into prison.

After release he kept pressing the political case of the zone: more chiefdoms, fairer representation, and an end to the cycle in which land, markets and memory of 1992 were used to keep communities at each other’s throats. He was later honoured among Southern Kaduna’s highest awards. His contribution was not a list of roads and clinics. It was refusal to accept a narrative that made his community the sole culprit and his own name a convenient scapegoat.

What Musa is doing for his people

Musa was born in Sokoto in 1967; his family is from Zangon Kataf. He rose through infantry command, theatre command in the North-East, and the office of Chief of Defence Staff (2023–2025) before becoming Minister of Defence in December 2025. His community has marked that rise with the title Tswung Atyap advocate of national unity and with plans for the zone’s highest honour.

His practical footprint at home is more visible than Lekwot’s later years. As CDS and then minister he has inspected and associated himself with projects in Zangon Kataf: the Defence Comprehensive Secondary School at Makamurung, the GWABIN CBT centre at Atanje, and the General Hospital at Zango.

He has used visits to call for peace between communities that have lived together for generations and to argue that education, health and skills are part of security, not a substitute for it. He has urged Southern Kaduna not to let “selfish individuals” reopen old divisions.

That is the development side. The political side is the Channels Television interview of 3 September 2026. Musa described El-Rufai’s years as governor as “toxic.”

He said the former governor divided the state so that people from the south could not freely live in the north. Asked whether Southern Kaduna was still unhappy, he answered that they could never be happy with someone who had “deliberately planned for the killing of our people,” and pointed to El-Rufai’s own public remarks about paying bandits.

Those remarks sit inside a longer, bitterly contested record. Southern Kaduna groups have catalogued repeated attacks on villages in Zangon Kataf, Kajuru, Kaura, Kauru and Jema’a between 2015 and 2023. El-Rufai publicly acknowledged paying Fulani from across the Sahel after the 2011 post-election violence, framing it as an effort to stop revenge. Critics called it an admission that armed groups were treated as bargaining partners rather than criminals.

Supporters of the former governor say he inherited a history of communal violence, that the military, not the governor, controlled operations, and that no court has ever convicted him of planning massacres. Retired officers who served in the state have said they received no order from Government House to spare attackers.

The El-Rufai family has now issued a seven-day demand: produce evidence of planned killings or retract on the same platform. Lawyers have spoken of damages. SOKAPU and the Middle Belt Forum have stood with Musa, calling the demand an attempt to intimidate a public official who described what their members lived through

Credentials and the right to speak

Lekwot’s credential was that he had already paid. Musa’s is that he commanded the armed forces of the federation and now sits in the Defence Ministry. Neither man is a village activist with no record. Both are products of the same institution that is supposed to stand above ethnicity. That is precisely why their words carry weight and why some want them unspoken.

The line the user offered is blunt: when you fail to speak up for your people, you fail at all you do. It is not a complete theory of statesmanship. A defence minister’s first duty is the whole country. But it is not an empty slogan either.

Southern Kaduna’s history is a chain of crises in which the official story often arrived before the facts, and in which prominent sons who contradicted that story were isolated. Lekwot lived that isolation. Musa is testing whether the same pattern still holds in 2026.

Zango Kataf does not need another general who only visits for photographs. It needs security that lasts, land disputes that are settled by law rather than by midnight raids, and a public record that does not treat one community’s dead as statistics and another’s as sacred.

Lekwot fought for the second of those things after the first had already failed him. Musa is trying to do both at once, build schools and hospitals in his local government, and refuse to describe the years of killings as an accident of geography.

Whether his specific charge against El-Rufai can be proved in a courtroom is a separate question from whether a son of Zangon Kataf who reached the top of the military has the right to say that his people were not protected.

He does. Lekwot claimed the same right under far harsher conditions. The resemblance is not accidental. It is the unfinished argument of Southern Kaduna itself.