The Traffic NG

Usman Yusuf

His latest call for President Bola Tinubu to resign is not the intervention of a statesman. It is the outburst of a politician who appears increasingly unable to distinguish between political opposition and constitutional reality.

For months, Nigerians have watched Obi drift steadily from the measured and restrained image that once earned him admiration across sections of the country. What we see today is something entirely different: a perpetual agitator whose politics now revolves around pessimism, alarmism and endless declarations of national collapse.

His demand that President Tinubu should resign exposes a profound misunderstanding of the very office he seeks to occupy.

Nigeria is not a parliamentary system where governments rise and fall on votes of confidence. Nigeria is a constitutional presidential democracy. Presidents are elected for fixed terms and leave office through elections, constitutional processes, incapacity or the expiration of their mandate. This is elementary civic knowledge.

READ ALSO: Tinubu Approves Six Federal Oncology Centres to Boost Cancer Care Nationwide

Yet Peter Obi, a former governor and presidential candidate, chose to ignore this basic reality in favour of cheap political theatre.

It raises a troubling question: if a man seeking the presidency cannot demonstrate respect for the constitutional foundations of the office, why should Nigerians trust him with that office?

Leadership is not measured by the frequency of complaints. It is measured by judgment, composure and the ability to offer solutions. On each of these counts, Obi’s recent conduct has been disappointing.

Every challenge facing Nigeria becomes, in Obi’s telling, proof of total failure. Every difficulty becomes a national catastrophe. Every setback becomes an excuse for outrage. Yet when the economy records growth, when foreign reserves rise, when revenues improve, when infrastructure projects advance, or when security forces record successes, Obi suddenly loses his voice.

His politics has become a politics of selective outrage.

A serious national leader acknowledges both challenges and progress. A serious leader offers alternatives. A serious leader understands that governing a nation of over 200 million people requires more than tweets, soundbites and perpetual criticism.

Increasingly, Peter Obi appears more comfortable leading online outrage than leading serious national conversations.

There was a time when many Nigerians viewed him as a credible presidential contender. That perception is fading rapidly. With each reckless statement, he reinforces the impression that he is less interested in governing Nigeria than in constantly protesting Nigeria.

The presidency is not an activist platform. It is not a protest movement. It is not a permanent grievance machine.

It demands maturity, balance, perspective and constitutional discipline.

By calling for President Tinubu’s resignation, Peter Obi has done more damage to his own presidential credentials than any political opponent could have done. He has revealed a level of impatience, poor judgment and political desperation that should concern even his most loyal supporters.

At some point, every politician must decide whether he wishes to be a serious contender for power or merely a professional critic of those who hold it.

Peter Obi’s latest outburst suggests he has made his choice.

The tragedy is that he may not realise it.